Xtrafrica found a PDF document, a legal brief filed by the U.S. government in 2012 in the case Madame Habyarimana, et al. v. Paul Kagame before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Here's a breakdown of what's in it:
What the Document Is:
Title: “Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellee”
Appellee: Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda
Appellants: Widows of President Juvénal Habyarimana (Rwanda) and Cyprien Ntaryamira (Burundi)
Purpose: To defend Kagame’s immunity from a civil lawsuit in U.S. courts over his alleged role in the 1994 assassination of the two presidents.
1. Lawsuit Accuses Kagame of Assassination
Plaintiffs alleged Kagame ordered the shooting down of President Habyarimana’s plane, which triggered the Rwandan Genocide.
They claimed Kagame, as head of the Rwandan Patriotic Army, did this to justify an invasion and power grab.
They sued for $250 million in damages under U.S. laws like the Alien Tort Statute, RICO Act, and international human rights law.
Kagame Escapes U.S. Case Over 1994 Plane Attack
Jun 16, 2025
May 15, 2026
3 min read
Published
Updated:
Xtrafrica found a PDF document, a legal brief filed by the U.S. government in 2012 in the case Madame Habyarimana, et al. v. Paul Kagame before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Here's a breakdown of what's in it:
What the Document Is:
Title: “Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellee”
Appellee: Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda
Appellants: Widows of President Juvénal Habyarimana (Rwanda) and Cyprien Ntaryamira (Burundi)
Purpose: To defend Kagame’s immunity from a civil lawsuit in U.S. courts over his alleged role in the 1994 assassination of the two presidents.
1. Lawsuit Accuses Kagame of Assassination
Plaintiffs alleged Kagame ordered the shooting down of President Habyarimana’s plane, which triggered the Rwandan Genocide.
They claimed Kagame, as head of the Rwandan Patriotic Army, did this to justify an invasion and power grab.
They sued for $250 million in damages under U.S. laws like the Alien Tort Statute, RICO Act, and international human rights law.
2. U.S. Government Protected Kagame
The State Department declared Kagame immune as a sitting head of state.
The brief insists U.S. courts must accept the Executive Branch’s immunity decisions without questioning.
This effectively shut down the lawsuit, not because Kagame was innocent, but because the U.S. chose not to allow it.
ADVERTISEMENT
READ ALSO : CONFIDENTIAL: USA document reveals Kagame’s Atrocities in 1996
3. No U.S. Court Has Ever Denied Immunity When State Dept. Asked
The brief admits: "In no case has a court ever subjected a sitting head of state to suit after the Executive Branch asserted the official’s immunity."
4. Kagame’s Immunity Covers Even Pre-Presidency Crimes
The U.S. argued Kagame is immune even for acts committed before taking office, including war crimes and assassinations.
They based this on customary international law, not U.S. law, showing how politics override justice.
5. Kagame Was Never Served Officially
The court also said the plaintiffs didn’t complete proper service of legal notice.
But even if they had, immunity would still have protected Kagame.
What This Reveals About Kagame and the U.S.:
The U.S. protected Kagame from justice for the 1994 double presidential assassination that sparked the genocide.
Kagame is above international law as long as he's president, not because he’s innocent, but because of geopolitical alliances.
This brief is damning proof of how Kagame uses Western protection to escape accountability for triggering mass atrocities.
ADVERTISEMENT
Download Full Document here
ADVERTISEMENT
POPULAR TODAY
ADVERTISEMENT
RELATED ARTICLE
