CAPE TOWN, South Africa — September 17, 2026. South African political parties and civil society groups have split over new United States visa restrictions targeting foreign nationals Washington says are involved in race-based discrimination, incitement of imminent violence or policies enabling uncompensated land seizures. Pretoria has rejected the US characterisation of its domestic policies and called for respect for South Africa's sovereignty.
Washington says the visa policy can apply to foreign nationals it considers responsible for specified race-based discrimination, incitement of imminent violence or policies enabling uncompensated land seizures in South Africa. Pretoria disputes the US framing, while South African political groups have offered sharply different reactions.
Washington sets out the new policy
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the policy on September 15. A US State Department press statement said the restrictions target foreign nationals the United States considers responsible for or complicit in policies enabling uncompensated land seizures, race-based discrimination or incitement of imminent violence against minority ethnic or racial groups in South Africa.
The statement said certain family members may also be covered and cited Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the US Immigration and Nationality Act.
The restrictions are not described as a blanket ban on South African citizens. Public announcements did not identify a complete list of individuals affected.
Washington's claims about discrimination and land policy are disputed by the South African government. They should therefore be understood as the stated basis for US policy, not as uncontested findings about South Africa.
Pretoria says its policies are being misrepresented
International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola responded with concern to what he called a unilateral move. Eyewitness News reported that his department said South Africa respects the right of the United States to develop its own laws but expects the same respect for South African sovereignty.
The department said South Africa's policies are intended to address historical inequality through constitutional and democratic processes.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
US Visa Restrictions on South Africa Draw Divided Political Reactions
Sep 17, 2026
Sep 17, 2026
5 min read
Published
Updated:
CAPE TOWN, South Africa — September 17, 2026. South African political parties and civil society groups have split over new United States visa restrictions targeting foreign nationals Washington says are involved in race-based discrimination, incitement of imminent violence or policies enabling uncompensated land seizures. Pretoria has rejected the US characterisation of its domestic policies and called for respect for South Africa's sovereignty.
Washington says the visa policy can apply to foreign nationals it considers responsible for specified race-based discrimination, incitement of imminent violence or policies enabling uncompensated land seizures in South Africa. Pretoria disputes the US framing, while South African political groups have offered sharply different reactions.
Washington sets out the new policy
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the policy on September 15. A US State Department press statement said the restrictions target foreign nationals the United States considers responsible for or complicit in policies enabling uncompensated land seizures, race-based discrimination or incitement of imminent violence against minority ethnic or racial groups in South Africa.
The statement said certain family members may also be covered and cited Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the US Immigration and Nationality Act.
The restrictions are not described as a blanket ban on South African citizens. Public announcements did not identify a complete list of individuals affected.
Washington's claims about discrimination and land policy are disputed by the South African government. They should therefore be understood as the stated basis for US policy, not as uncontested findings about South Africa.
ADVERTISEMENT
Pretoria says its policies are being misrepresented
International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola responded with concern to what he called a unilateral move. Eyewitness News reported that his department said South Africa respects the right of the United States to develop its own laws but expects the same respect for South African sovereignty.
The department said South Africa's policies are intended to address historical inequality through constitutional and democratic processes.
Reuters reported that Pretoria said the US move reflected a mischaracterisation of domestic policy promoted by groups that the government says do not represent all Afrikaners or minority communities.
The dispute sits within a broader deterioration in US-South Africa relations under President Donald Trump's administration, with disagreements over race policy, land reform and foreign affairs.
South African parties split over the decision
The latest phase of the story is the domestic reaction. EWN reported on September 17 that Afrikaner advocacy group Lex Libertas and the Freedom Front Plus welcomed the policy.
ADVERTISEMENT
The FF Plus said it viewed the US request as reasonable. Its position reflects longstanding criticism by the party of some race-based policies and aspects of land reform.
The uMkhonto weSizwe Party and Economic Freedom Fighters rejected the restrictions. According to EWN, they characterised the measure as an attempt by Washington to use diplomatic and economic power to interfere in South Africa's sovereign affairs.
Those are political positions rather than independent findings about the policy's legality or effects. The contrasting responses illustrate how the US move intersects with existing South African disputes over transformation, property, race and the legacy of apartheid.
What the policy does and does not establish
The State Department policy provides the US government with an immigration mechanism to deny entry to people it determines fall within the stated categories. Visa decisions are generally an exercise of national immigration authority.
It does not by itself invalidate South African laws, change the country's land-reform framework or determine whether a South African policy is constitutional. Those questions remain governed by South African law and institutions.
Likewise, Washington's allegations about discrimination are contested by Pretoria. South African policies such as affirmative-action measures are defended by the government as efforts to address inequalities created under apartheid, while critics argue that some measures unfairly discriminate on racial grounds.
That policy dispute is likely to continue independently of the visa restrictions.
TRENDING NOW
POPULAR TODAY
ADVERTISEMENT
Bilateral tension returns to the foreground
The restrictions renew attention on relations between Washington and Pretoria after months of disputes over domestic and foreign policy.
Associated Press reported that the Trump administration has taken a series of measures toward South Africa while accusing the government of mistreating white citizens. Pretoria has repeatedly rejected claims of systematic persecution.
The visa measure is more targeted than a general restriction on travel from South Africa, but it carries diplomatic significance because it directly links entry to the United States with Washington's assessment of South African policy choices.
The next practical question is which individuals, if any, are formally subjected to the restrictions and whether Washington announces additional measures. Pretoria's response will also be closely watched as both governments manage wider trade, diplomatic and security ties.
ADVERTISEMENT
RELATED ARTICLE
