The UK denies Julius Malema entry over pro-Palestine and anti-colonial stance. EFF responds with bold Pan-African message.

June 19, 2025 at 6:17:19 PM

May 15, 2026 at 7:03:26 PM

🕒 3 min read

By

Author Name

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Julius malema

South Africa’s revolutionary leader, Julius Malema, has once again been denied entry into the UK - and this time, it’s not about paperwork.

According to the UK Home Office, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader was labeled “non-conducive to the public good” and “undesirable” following his vocal support for Hamas and his unapologetic calls for land justice in South Africa. The UK cited speeches where Malema said his party would support arming the Palestinian group Hamas, and also pointed to past statements seen as inflammatory toward the white minority in South Africa.

We will not trade our revolutionary beliefs in exchange for a visa," declared the EFF in a fiery response, accusing the UK of cowardice and of distorting Malema’s views on Black frustration, inequality, and the colonial legacy that still haunts South Africa.

The EFF also stated plainly:

The UK and all its allies can keep their visas. We will keep our Africa, and our commitment to support the oppressed of the world, especially the Palestinian people."

This is the second time in two months that Malema has been denied entry to Britain. The first time, officials claimed the application was late. But this time, the UK made it clear: this was a “substantive decision” with no right to appeal.

Malema, a fierce critic of Western imperialism, has long pushed for the nationalization of white-owned land, unapologetically confronting the injustices left by apartheid and colonialism. His message resonates with millions of Black South Africans who remain locked out of the economy nearly 30 years after freedom was declared.

Despite this, UK authorities used a controversial clip of Malema singing protest songs, including “Shoot to Kill” and “Kill the Boer,” as a reason to block him. That same video was recently played by Donald Trump during a meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

Yet South Africa’s own Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the lyrics do not amount to hate speech, stating that they are “a provocative way of advancing a political agenda,” not a call to violence.