top of page

The Congolese government has dismissed reports claiming that M23 fighters are withdrawing from Uvira, calling the announcements misleading, tactical, and disconnected from realities on the ground.


Speaking on the situation, Government Spokesperson Patrick Muyaya was categorical: M23 and its backers should never have been in Uvira in the first place. For Kinshasa, any talk of withdrawal loses meaning when it refers to a presence that was illegal from the outset.


Muyaya warned that the government is fully familiar with what he described as well-rehearsed disinformation tactics. According to him, staged withdrawals, selective images, or media-oriented announcements are often used to simulate compliance while maintaining control through infiltrated elements left behind in occupied areas. In his words, “What is a withdrawal without a real departure worth?”


The minister directly addressed the narrative repeatedly used to justify the attack on Uvira — the alleged “protection of the Banyamulenge community.” He rejected this argument as a false pretext, noting that it has been echoed consistently by Rwanda and M23 in international forums. Muyaya warned that this same narrative could now be recycled by leaving behind agents tasked with targeting Banyamulenge civilians in order to fabricate fresh incidents and shift blame.


For Kinshasa, a withdrawal will only be considered real when state authority is fully restored, including the return of civil administration, security services, and the protection of all communities without distinction. The government insists that its responsibility is not selective — the Congolese state is committed to ensuring the safety of every citizen, including the Banyamulenge population.


Muyaya also revealed that behind the public claims of withdrawal lies another reality: systematic looting. According to Congolese authorities, armed groups have not only exploited mines, but have also stolen public infrastructure materials, household goods, livestock, vehicles, and even road construction tar. He described a pattern seen in Goma, Bukavu, and Uvira, where armed groups leave behind destruction while transporting stolen resources across borders.


Despite these tactics, the government says it remains vigilant on all fronts — military, diplomatic, and judicial. Muyaya stressed that while peace processes continue, justice cannot be avoided indefinitely. For Kinshasa, accountability will eventually be required for what it describes as occupation, plunder, and violence against civilians.


In conclusion, the government’s message is firm: media announcements do not replace facts on the ground. Any genuine de-escalation must be measured not by statements, but by verifiable withdrawal, restored state authority, and lasting security for civilians.

WAR IN EASTERN DRC

Why Kinshasa Rejects Claims of an M23 “Withdrawal” from Uvira

 Serge Kitoko Tshibanda

Par

 Serge Kitoko Tshibanda

Political Analyst

18 janv. 2026

15 mai 2026

3 min read

DRC rejects claims that M23 fighters have withdrawn from Uvira, calling them disinformation and warning of infiltration, looting, and false narratives.

Publié

Mis à jour:

The Congolese government has dismissed reports claiming that M23 fighters are withdrawing from Uvira, calling the announcements misleading, tactical, and disconnected from realities on the ground.


Speaking on the situation, Government Spokesperson Patrick Muyaya was categorical: M23 and its backers should never have been in Uvira in the first place. For Kinshasa, any talk of withdrawal loses meaning when it refers to a presence that was illegal from the outset.


PUBLICITÉ

Muyaya warned that the government is fully familiar with what he described as well-rehearsed disinformation tactics. According to him, staged withdrawals, selective images, or media-oriented announcements are often used to simulate compliance while maintaining control through infiltrated elements left behind in occupied areas. In his words, “What is a withdrawal without a real departure worth?”


The minister directly addressed the narrative repeatedly used to justify the attack on Uvira — the alleged “protection of the Banyamulenge community.” He rejected this argument as a false pretext, noting that it has been echoed consistently by Rwanda and M23 in international forums. Muyaya warned that this same narrative could now be recycled by leaving behind agents tasked with targeting Banyamulenge civilians in order to fabricate fresh incidents and shift blame.


PUBLICITÉ

Tendances actuelles

Kindu Nurses’ Strike Disrupts Care and Childhood Vaccination

Healthcare System

EAC Preparedness Plan: What Must Be Ready Before Floods

Regional Blocs (AU, SADC, EAC, ECOWAS)

DR Congo's Juliana Lumumba Seeks to Reshape the Francophonie

Francophone

River Offin Girls’ Rights Decision: What Must Change?

Education

Populaire aujourd'hui

Healthcare System

Kindu Nurses’ Strike Disrupts Care and Childhood Vaccination

Francophone

DR Congo's Juliana Lumumba Seeks to Reshape the Francophonie

Policy and Reforms

US Democrats' Rwanda Record: Peaceful Change and Congo Sovereignty

War in Eastern DRC

Muyaya: Congo's War Has Nothing to Do With the Constitution

Infrastructure

DRC Signs Contracts to Modernise 13 Airports, First Deliveries in 2028

For Kinshasa, a withdrawal will only be considered real when state authority is fully restored, including the return of civil administration, security services, and the protection of all communities without distinction. The government insists that its responsibility is not selective — the Congolese state is committed to ensuring the safety of every citizen, including the Banyamulenge population.


Muyaya also revealed that behind the public claims of withdrawal lies another reality: systematic looting. According to Congolese authorities, armed groups have not only exploited mines, but have also stolen public infrastructure materials, household goods, livestock, vehicles, and even road construction tar. He described a pattern seen in Goma, Bukavu, and Uvira, where armed groups leave behind destruction while transporting stolen resources across borders.


PUBLICITÉ

Despite these tactics, the government says it remains vigilant on all fronts — military, diplomatic, and judicial. Muyaya stressed that while peace processes continue, justice cannot be avoided indefinitely. For Kinshasa, accountability will eventually be required for what it describes as occupation, plunder, and violence against civilians.


In conclusion, the government’s message is firm: media announcements do not replace facts on the ground. Any genuine de-escalation must be measured not by statements, but by verifiable withdrawal, restored state authority, and lasting security for civilians.

PUBLICITÉ

Articles connexes

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Healthcare System

Kindu Nurses’ Strike Disrupts Care and Childhood Vaccination

Patients face interrupted services as the labour dispute continues in Maniema.

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Francophone

DR Congo's Juliana Lumumba Seeks to Reshape the Francophonie

DR Congo's Juliana Lumumba proposes nine reforms for the Francophonie, challenging Rwanda's Louise

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Policy and Reforms

US Democrats' Rwanda Record: Peaceful Change and Congo Sovereignty

Will Democrats support Kagame after the 2026 midterms? Blinken's statements, Biden's Rwanda policy

Image-place-holder_edited.png

War in Eastern DRC

Muyaya: Congo's War Has Nothing to Do With the Constitution

In London, the DRC government spokesperson rejects constitutional politics as a cause of the eastern

Tags

DR.Congo

Patrick Muyaya Katembwe

bottom of page