DRC Accuses MTN Rwanda of Illegal Operations in Goma

Goma/Rutshuru – February 11, 2026, The Democratic Republic of Congo’s telecom regulator (ARPTC) has formally accused Rwanda and its affiliate, MTN Rwanda, of illegally providing mobile and internet services inside Congolese territory, specifically in the areas of Goma and Rutshuru, which are currently under partial control of the Rwandan army and M23/AFC rebel coalition.

These territories, long acknowledged by the international community as Congolese, have been under unlawful occupation by M23 rebels, a proxy force widely documented as backed by Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s regime.

“This constitutes a serious breach of Congo’s digital sovereignty,” the ARPTC said. “MTN Rwanda is operating without any legal authorization from Congolese authorities, and must be held accountable.”

Digital Invasion Adds to Kigali’s Crimes

This latest violation is more than a business dispute; it is an extension of Rwanda’s multi-front interference in the DRC. Already accused of military aggression, looting of mineral wealth, and supporting a rebel group responsible for massacres, Kigali now stands accused of violating international telecom laws and Congolese national regulations.

The telecom watchdog confirmed it has referred the case to both national courts and international bodies. Legal experts say the move could trigger sanctions or revocation of operating licenses across borders, especially if MTN Group is found complicit.

"Operating telecom infrastructure without state authorization in occupied territory is a violation of both national and international law,” noted a senior official at Congo’s Ministry of Justice.

Congo Strikes Back: Legal Action Imminent

Prime Minister Judith Suminwa has reportedly instructed the Ministry of Digital and International Cooperation to lodge formal complaints with regional regulatory bodies and the African Union. Sources indicate Congo may pursue sanctions against both MTN Rwanda and the Rwandan government for economic aggression.

Observers warn this case could become a precedent in African digital sovereignty, particularly as telecom infrastructure becomes a battlefield for control in conflict zones.