Heading 2
Heading 2
Heading 2

The Rwandan Army is commanding the M23 rebels, according to the UN-US Ambassador
M23’s Claimed Withdrawal from Uvira Met with Doubts
Kinshasa disputes M23’s announced pullout from Uvira, citing staged retreat and Rwanda’s continued presence.
12/19/25, 3:30 PM
KINSHASA — December 18, 2025 | The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has raised serious doubts over the authenticity of the withdrawal announced by Rwanda-backed M23/AFC rebels from the eastern city of Uvira, describing it as a possible diversionary tactic to reduce international pressure, according to the report by BBC News Africa
According to Provincial Government of SUD-KIVU spokesperson Me Didier Kabi, credible intelligence suggests the alleged pullout is not a genuine disengagement but a staged maneuver aimed at misleading both national and international observers. “We observed near-empty jeeps in circulated videos, with only drivers and a few personnel onboard,” said Kabi, adding that the operation lacked transparency and coordination.
He further reported that a contingent of rebels was seen moving by foot through the Muami corridor and Kashekebwe hills, toward the Fizi highlands, indicating an attempt to regroup and potentially encircle Uvira. “Elements of M23 remain just 9 km from the city, still equipped with heavy artillery,” he noted.
Government officials say Rwandan military personnel aligned with M23 were spotted in civilian areas, including Kavimvira and Kiliba, raising concerns of infiltration disguised as withdrawal. New unidentified individuals in civilian attire were also seen within Uvira, suspected of being combatants blending into the population in preparation for renewed hostilities.
Congolese media outlets, including Radio Okapi and CongoNews, have widely reported these developments, citing local residents and civil society leaders who confirmed continued rebel presence near administrative buildings and road junctions.
Communications Minister Patrick Muyaya emphasized the government’s position, stating that the withdrawal announcement lacks independent verification. “Who can confirm this? Where are they going? What are they leaving behind? We have to remain vigilant,” he posted on X (formerly Twitter).
The rebel occupation of Uvira occurred just days after the Washington Peace Accord was signed on December 4 by Presidents Félix Tshisekedi and Paul Kagame under the mediation of former U.S. President Donald Trump. While the M23 group was not a direct signatory, they have been involved in a parallel peace track mediated by Qatar.
International condemnation followed swiftly after the offensive. The United Nations reported at least 74 deaths, over 100 injuries, and more than 200,000 people displaced, including 30,000 who crossed into neighboring Burundi. The U.S. has since criticized the seizure of Uvira and warned of potential consequences for violations of the peace accord.
M23 leader Bertrand Bisimwa claimed the withdrawal was "in progress" and framed it as a contribution to peace. In a post on X, he called on international partners to help ensure the city is not subjected to violence or retaliation. However, Kinshasa maintains that only a fully verifiable and unconditional withdrawal, monitored by neutral parties, can restore trust in the peace process.
Local security officials have not yet confirmed the rebel departure, and civil society voices report ongoing tensions. South Kivu authorities have reiterated the need for clear guarantees and international oversight to ensure the safety of civilians and the full implementation of the Washington and Doha peace frameworks.
source from the original article by BBC NEWS Africa
Keep Reading







