top of page

A legal dispute has arisen over the ownership of Grammy-winning artist Burna Boy’s early music catalogue, following a lawsuit filed by 960 Music Group seeking to overturn a multi-million-dollar transaction involving his former record label.


The case relates to a deal allegedly concluded in mid-2024, in which Aristokrat Music, the label that signed Burna Boy at the start of his career, sold his early master recordings and intellectual property rights to Spaceship Music, his current imprint led by the artist and his mother, Bose Ogulu.


960 Music Group, which owns a 40 percent stake in Aristokrat Music, claims the sale was carried out without its knowledge, consent, or board approval. The company has filed suit in Port Harcourt, arguing that the catalogue constitutes a major corporate asset that could not legally be sold without the agreement of all principal shareholders.


The dispute has also taken on a criminal dimension. Nigeria’s Force Criminal Investigation Department has filed charges against Aristokrat Music founder Piriye Isokrari following investigations into allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. Authorities allege that proceeds from the sale were diverted and that corporate governance processes were bypassed in negotiating the transaction with Spaceship Music.


An executive at 960 Music Group said the company had no option but to seek legal intervention, maintaining that assets of such value cannot be transferred unilaterally.


The case places Burna Boy’s early catalogue under legal uncertainty. While the deal was expected to grant him full control of his early masters, a court ruling in favour of 960 Music could require his label to surrender rights to some of his breakthrough recordings.


Legal analysts say the outcome could have broader implications for music rights ownership, shareholder authority, and record label governance within Nigeria’s entertainment industry.


Source

The Sun Nigeria

ENTERTAINMENT

960 Music challenges Burna Boy catalogue sale in court

Witty Pascal

By

Witty Pascal

Entertainment Editor

Feb 9, 2026

May 15, 2026

2 min read

960 Music has filed a lawsuit to void the sale of Burna Boy’s early music catalogue, citing lack of shareholder consent.

Published

Updated:

A legal dispute has arisen over the ownership of Grammy-winning artist Burna Boy’s early music catalogue, following a lawsuit filed by 960 Music Group seeking to overturn a multi-million-dollar transaction involving his former record label.


The case relates to a deal allegedly concluded in mid-2024, in which Aristokrat Music, the label that signed Burna Boy at the start of his career, sold his early master recordings and intellectual property rights to Spaceship Music, his current imprint led by the artist and his mother, Bose Ogulu.


960 Music Group, which owns a 40 percent stake in Aristokrat Music, claims the sale was carried out without its knowledge, consent, or board approval. The company has filed suit in Port Harcourt, arguing that the catalogue constitutes a major corporate asset that could not legally be sold without the agreement of all principal shareholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

The dispute has also taken on a criminal dimension. Nigeria’s Force Criminal Investigation Department has filed charges against Aristokrat Music founder Piriye Isokrari following investigations into allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. Authorities allege that proceeds from the sale were diverted and that corporate governance processes were bypassed in negotiating the transaction with Spaceship Music.


An executive at 960 Music Group said the company had no option but to seek legal intervention, maintaining that assets of such value cannot be transferred unilaterally.


ADVERTISEMENT

The case places Burna Boy’s early catalogue under legal uncertainty. While the deal was expected to grant him full control of his early masters, a court ruling in favour of 960 Music could require his label to surrender rights to some of his breakthrough recordings.



Legal analysts say the outcome could have broader implications for music rights ownership, shareholder authority, and record label governance within Nigeria’s entertainment industry.

Trending Now

DRC Opens London Forum Seeking Partnerships, Not Aid

| Economy

Kenya's Rironi–Naivasha Highway: 90% Earthworks, December Target

Transport and Logistics

Burundi Plans Protection of 21 Lake Tanganyika Spawning Areas

Business Trends

Africa Energy Bank Explained: Funding, Purpose and Projects

Energy and Power

Popular Today

Biography

Poco Lee Biography: Age, Real Name, Dance Career and Songs

Biography

Eric Omondi Biography: Comedy, Activism and Public Life

Biography

Who Is Snit Habteab, Eritrea’s Miss World Trailblazer?

Entertainment

Poco Lee UK Case Sparks Consent Debate Among Nigerian Stars

Entertainment

FOLA Leads 2026 Headies Nominations Ahead of Toronto

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Articles

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Biography

Poco Lee Biography: Age, Real Name, Dance Career and Songs

Inside the Nigerian dancer’s rise from Ojo street shows to Afrobeats stages, music and global fame.

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Biography

Eric Omondi Biography: Comedy, Activism and Public Life

How Eric Omondi rose through Churchill Show and became a prominent Kenyan activist.

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Biography

Who Is Snit Habteab, Eritrea’s Miss World Trailblazer?

The neuroscientist and educator became Eritrea’s first Miss World entrant and reached the Top 6

Image-place-holder_edited.png

Entertainment

Poco Lee UK Case Sparks Consent Debate Among Nigerian Stars

The dancer faces five sexual offence charges and returns to court on September 15.

Tags

Entertainment

Nigerian Entertainment

Nigeria

bottom of page