top of page

The EAC Court of Justice rules it has jurisdiction to hear DR Congo’s case against Rwanda over aggression and violations of sovereignty.

EAC Court Rejects Rwanda’s Objections, Proceeds with DRC Case

The EAC Court of Justice rules it has jurisdiction to hear DR Congo’s case against Rwanda over aggression and violations of sovereignty.

Published:

November 23, 2025 at 4:18:08 PM

Modified:

November 23, 2025 at 5:17:27 PM

Guerson Nabushi Nyonkourou

Written By |

Guerson Nabushi Nyonkourou

Political Analyst

The East African Court of Justice (EACJ) has delivered a landmark ruling in the dispute between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, rejecting all preliminary objections raised by Kigali and confirming its jurisdiction to examine the case on its merits.


The case, filed by Kinshasa in September 2023, accuses Rwanda of undermining Congo’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and stability through direct military incursions in North Kivu Province in coordination with the M23 rebel movement.


What the ruling means

The Court found that the alleged acts, attacks in Rutshuru, Masisi, and Nyiragongo territories between August 2022 and March 2023, occurred after the DRC joined the East African Community in July 2022, making the Court fully competent to hear the case.


Rwanda had argued that some incidents pre-dated Congo’s EAC membership, but judges dismissed this reasoning as “without merit.” The bench also rejected Kigali’s claim that the DRC had “no valid cause of action,” recalling that under the EAC Treaty, any member state may bring a case when another is suspected of violating obligations of sovereignty, non-aggression, and regional security.


Context and regional significance

This marks the first time the EAC Court of Justice will examine the merits of an intra-bloc conflict. It comes amid a wider trend of African institutions asserting judicial authority over regional disputes.


In February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, also based in Arusha, rejected similar Rwandan objections in a separate case filed by Congo concerning human-rights violations and civilian impacts linked to the eastern conflict.


For Kinshasa, the EACJ ruling strengthens President Félix Antoine Tshisekedi’s “judicial front” strategy: pairing diplomacy with legal action to hold Rwanda accountable for alleged war crimes and territorial violations.


Next steps in the case

Rwanda must now file its defence on the merits within the deadlines set by the Court. The judges will then review evidence, hear witnesses, and determine potential responsibility.


The proceedings are being handled by the Task Force for International Justice, a joint team of Congolese and international lawyers created under President Tshisekedi’s directive to pursue accountability in regional, continental, and global jurisdictions.


Observers say the outcome could reshape how the East African Community enforces its own treaty principles, and test whether regional law can deter state-sponsored aggression within Africa

DR.Congo

Rwanda

Keep Reading

What a “Full Withdrawal” from Uvira Would Really Require

War in Eastern DRC

What a “Full Withdrawal” from Uvira Would Really Require

DRC Authorities Say M23 Withdrawal from Uvira Not Credible Without Territorial Exit

Tshisekedi’s Grand Strategy at Davos 2026

Business & Investment

Tshisekedi’s Grand Strategy at Davos 2026

Tshisekedi’s Grand Strategy: Inside His Bid to Redefine Africa’s Place in the Global Order

Why Kinshasa Rejects Claims of an M23 “Withdrawal” from Uvira

War in Eastern DRC

Why Kinshasa Rejects Claims of an M23 “Withdrawal” from Uvira

DRC says claims of M23 withdrawal from Uvira are misleading, warning of disinformation & infiltration

Clashes Between M23 and Wazalendo Continue in Rutshuru

War in DR Congo

Clashes Between M23 and Wazalendo Continue in Rutshuru

Fighting is reported for a third day around Mweso as civilians are injured in North Kivu

Beige White Modern Photo Collage Instagr
bottom of page